ADVERTISEMENT

Napoleon in a Glass: A Lazy Yet Delicious Dessert

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Ingredients You’ll Need

* Puff pastry crisps or crisp cookies (like graham crackers or ladyfingers)
* Vanilla custard or instant pudding mix (prepared)
* Whipped cream (fresh or store-bought)
* Optional: fresh berries, chocolate shavings, or a dusting of powdered sugar for garnish

### How to Make It

1. **Prepare the custard or pudding** according to package instructions or your favorite recipe and let it chill.
2. **Crush the puff pastry crisps or cookies lightly** if they’re too large to fit nicely in your glass.
3. In your serving glasses, **start with a layer of custard**, followed by a layer of crushed pastry.
4. Add a generous layer of whipped cream on top.
5. Repeat the layers — custard, pastry, whipped cream — until the glass is full, finishing with whipped cream.
6. Garnish with fresh berries, chocolate shavings, or a sprinkle of powdered sugar for that extra wow factor.

### Why This Recipe Works

* **Speed and simplicity:** No baking or complicated assembly required.
* **Customizable:** Swap out custard for flavored pudding, add nuts or fruit, or layer with different cookies.
* **Portion-friendly:** Individual servings mean less waste and more control.
* **Delicious:** The texture contrast between creamy custard, fluffy whipped cream, and crunchy pastry layers is pure indulgence.

### Serving Suggestions

Napoleon in a Glass is perfect for family dinners, potlucks, or even a casual afternoon tea. You can prepare the components ahead of time and assemble just before serving, making it a stress-free dessert option.

### Final Thoughts

This lazy yet delicious take on the classic Napoleon lets you enjoy the best parts of the dessert without the hassle. It’s elegant enough to impress guests and simple enough for weeknight cravings. Next time you want a quick, crowd-pleasing sweet treat, reach for this easy Napoleon in a Glass — your taste buds will thank you!

Would you like me to add a detailed recipe with exact measurements, or keep it more conceptual?